Jump to content

Talk:Theta Pavonis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned references in Theta Pavonis

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Theta Pavonis's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "SIMBAD":

  • From NU Pavonis: SIMBAD, NU Pavonis (accessed 10 January 2013)
  • From Nu Pavonis: SIMBAD, Nu Pavonis (accessed 10 January 2013)
  • From Lambda Pavonis: SIMBAD, Lambda Pavonis (accessed 6 January 2013)
  • From Kappa Pavonis: SIMBAD, Kappa Pavonis (accessed 10 January 2013)
  • From Beta Pavonis: SIMBAD, Beta Pavonis (accessed 6 January 2013)
  • From Zeta Pavonis: SIMBAD, Zeta Pavonis (accessed 6 January 2013)
  • From Rho Pavonis: SIMBAD, Rho Pavonis (accessed 10 January 2013)
  • From Stellar classification: "SIMBAD Object query : CCDM J02319+8915". Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  • From Pi Pavonis: SIMBAD, HR 6745 (accessed 6 January 2013)
  • From Alpha Pavonis: "PEACOCK -- Spectroscopic binary", SIMBAD, Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg, retrieved 2011-12-23
  • From Delta Pavonis: "NSV 12790 -- Variable Star". SIMBAD. Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 2009-08-21.
  • From Eta Pavonis: SIMBAD, Eta Pavonis (accessed 6 January 2013)
  • From Epsilon Pavonis: SIMBAD, Epsilon Pavonis (accessed 6 January 2013)
  • From Xi Pavonis: SIMBAD, Xi Pavonis (accessed 10 January 2013)
  • From Phi1 Pavonis: SIMBAD, HR 7848 (accessed 10 January 2013)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 22:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]