Talk:Timeline of the gunpowder age
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Timeline of the gunpowder age in Southeast Asia page were merged into Timeline of the gunpowder age on 23 June 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the Timeline of the gunpowder age in South Asia page were merged into Timeline of the gunpowder age on 23 June 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the Timeline of the gunpowder age in Korea page were merged into Timeline of the gunpowder age on 23 June 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the Timeline of the gunpowder age in Japan page were merged into Timeline of the gunpowder age on 23 June 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merge? Are regional sub-articles warranted?
[edit]While having regional breakdowns of the main Timeline of the gunpowder age article can be useful, there are a few concerns:
- each subarticle only consists of a few items each, combined with a fully duplicated reference list (i.e. an WP:OVERLAP concern)
- there is a maintenance burden and risk of getting the articles out of sync - i.e. any changes to a sub-article would need to propagated to the main article, and vice-versa
It may be better to work on the main article for now, but will consider any consensus that indicates the overlap and maintenance risks can be kept under control. Dl2000 (talk) 05:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- ... in any case, the merge proposal should not detract from the impressive content work and referencing efforts done so far in creating the timeline. Dl2000 (talk) 05:39, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- As of now, the regional lists aren't long enough to warrant separate articles yet. I support merging them back into the main article.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 14:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Merging is fine; the only question is how? Can I suggest that an additional column for Region be added at the far end of the tables. I'm also not sure that the current formatting with multiple table is helpful. One large table which could then be switched to a sortable table might be more helpful for readers, as that would then also allow sorting by region (to maintain, in essence, regional lists within the table, as well as a chronological list). Klbrain (talk) 05:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- After looking at the items in the article it seems like there's mostly selected rows from the larger list. I think it would be fine just incorporating the items that are not part of the main article into the current list without additional subdivisions since those sections would be mostly overlap with the main list. A bit of prose for each area would be a very good addition though if anyone wants to do it. Trialpears (talk) 22:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Merging is fine; the only question is how? Can I suggest that an additional column for Region be added at the far end of the tables. I'm also not sure that the current formatting with multiple table is helpful. One large table which could then be switched to a sortable table might be more helpful for readers, as that would then also allow sorting by region (to maintain, in essence, regional lists within the table, as well as a chronological list). Klbrain (talk) 05:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- As of now, the regional lists aren't long enough to warrant separate articles yet. I support merging them back into the main article.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 14:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 14:51, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:55, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
- Breech loading arquebus 1598.jpg
- Breech loading arquebus with bayonet 1606.png
- Gong she huo shi liu jian.png
- Manual Fire Arrow.jpg
- Oldest depiction of rocket arrows.jpg
- Poison eruptor.jpg
- Two barreled automatic fire lance from the Huolongjing.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)