Jump to content

Talk:Tithonus (The X-Files)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 00:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Polished it up, looks grand to go.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    Cleaned up a few instances of the same ref used multiple times consecutively. If a few sentences in a row, or a whole paragraph, stem from a single source, then don't be afraid to just cite it all at once; each sentence doesn't need a citation unless it's a different one being used.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Bunged in an extra review for you to round out the scope a bit.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Grand.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Not an issue.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Grand enough. I'd say drop in a mention of how the desaturation in the non-free image is discussed in the article though. Pity there's no free images of Weegee's work to add an example.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    I've fixed anything I saw wrong with this one, so it should be good to go. Going to pass it. Well done. GRAPPLE X 00:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]