Talk:Tol Language (Honduras)

Peer review

It looks like your article has a good introduction and background/ethnography section so far. I think the tone is good for an article/encyclopedia as well, and it seems neutral and factual so far. Looking at your sources, I can see somewhat where you might take the rest of the article, but I'd like to emphasize some of the more linguistic aspects of the language, as it seems most of your sources deal with the sociology and geography of the language. I see that you have a source that lists the phonology of the language (Fleming) and I suggest a section dedicated to that specifically. I've also added in [citation needed] where I feel it would be best to add a source, as there are some spots that require citations that currently do not have them. Mcg161 (talk) 15:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

I agree with what Mcg161 said about the tone and agree with where the [citation needed]s were added. I like that you list the alternate names for the language as it helps people researching it who may be looking for it by a different name. Also, fix the link to the ELP, i know there is a wiki article already made for it, try searching "Endangered Languages Project" when you click the hyperlink. While I agree that linguistics is a key aspect and needs to be addressed, and also do not think this is what mcg161 is implying, but do not abandon the sociology and geography, as they are important as well to developing a full article around the language. Burgherben (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)