Talk:Torchwood/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tgrosinger (talk · contribs) 16:42, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Upon first read through I believe this article to be of the necessary level for Good Article. It is very well sourced, covers a very broad view of the television show, and though it has many recent edits, these edits are almost exclusively constructive or minor edits aimed at making the article as close to perfect as possible.

Through out the article, the writers have inter-weaved direct quotes from involved individuals to add credibility to this article. There are a couple of sections that seem slightly lacking (such as directing and crew) however the information they provide is informative and relevant.

In addition to the writing, this article features several images and charts which provide additional context and represent information in a more graphical form for users skimming for particular facts (such as a season release date). The article seems to be written in a neutral manner, providing verifiable facts rather than opinions.

Overall I believe this is an excellent candidate for Good Article status and other than a few very minor revisions is an excellent article that shows healthy activity and collaboration.

Tgrosinger (talk) 17:12, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

• I have to disagree. The article is underweight in terms of content covering all four series (directing and writing in particular), its reception section is anemic and unbalanced, and the international broadcaster's section is unsourced, messy and possibly trivial (Wikipedia is not, after all IMDb). Another copyedit might be necessary as well. It has a little way to go in order to get GA, although being awarded GA status is not inconceivable.Zythe (talk) 15:43, 28 February 2013 (UTC)