Talk:Toronto Maple Leafs/GA2
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DannyMusicEditor (talk · contribs) 22:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Okay, since I became a hockey fan a little while ago (go Pens, and no, I'm not a bandwagon) AND I'm an experienced editor, I can take this. I don't know a lot of original six history, or even much about the Leafs, but I know enough about Wikipedia to say this is definitely a 
fail. The nominator was completely uninvolved with the project [1], though I do have to give props to Johnny Au for his work so far. The big thing is that many parts of the article are missing citations, and the article is deceivingly pretty at first ("early years section").
It just gets uglier after that. Conn Smythe barely has any cites on his section, and from then on, you don't see a single footnote until Ballard's years (which still only has one). Way too much research and time necessary for me to hold this. Some places I've skimmed through also have POV violations, and prose might do better with a copyedit.