Talk:Training ship

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

CL

This article has been rated as CL-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Training ship

I have changed the name of this article from School ship to Training ship. The latter seems to be preferred common usage, for example Google returns 258,000 hits for Training ship but only 39,000 hits for School ship. --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trek

This is decidedly nerdy but... On what basis is anyone claiming USS Republic to be a Starfleet training vessel? It is perfectly possible for Ensign Kirk to be an officer in training on an ordinary ship of the line. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.30.232.1 (talk) 12:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it should perhaps contain information on ships that functions as floating schools

in norway for example there is ships that serve as schools. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.59.120 (talk) 14:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Cornwall and HMS Wellesley

In the Royal Navy sub-list, the entry Cornwall is wikilinked to the article "HMS Wellesley (1815)" and then further down, the entry Wellesley is wikilinked to the article "HMS Cornwall (1812)". Confusing or what? There is a sort of logic intended, as the ships swapped names in the 1860s, but it's difficult to comprehend which one is truly which, until one re-reads each of the two linked articles several times... There has to be a better (clearer) way to indicate upfront what ship you're about to be taken to, ie 'Ship A (later renamed B)' and 'Ship B (later renamed A)' etc. So I'll try to clarify the list-references tomorrow, although it's not an easy task - in fact it's quite difficult to keep the whole list homogenous, as some of the ships listed became TS's, some remained HMS ships (renamed), and one or two are now shore-based schools that don't have a ship anymore (eg. HMS President has several wiki articles, one of which is a shore frigate!). Pete Hobbs (talk) 04:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsensical content

Greetings! This article, Training ship, has a large amount of content that clearly doesn't belong. It looks something like a map of train traffic written in a language I don't recognize. Starting around line 10.

I have tried pinpointing when and how it happened at the Article History. The 2024, Sept 08 version looks normal but at the next edit, Sept 26, the large amount of nonsensical content is there.

Both I don't know how to correct it, how to remove all the nonsensical content. And also I can't tell if it's a case of deliberate vandalism or maybe an accident. Cheers, Lars Lars A (talk) 19:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]