Talk:Training to failure

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Current research may contradict article[edit]

This page is really poorly supported by research. For example https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26666744 states the complete opposite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.57.104.135 (talk) 11:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is poorly sourced, and would benefit from the academic research findings found here, here and here. 14.2.198.139 (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the paper you're citing: has an issued correction: In it, the authors rewrite some statements to indicate there was no significant difference between failure and non-failure training. For example, in the abstract:

"Non-failure training resulted in a 0.6–1.3% greater strength increase than failure training." (original)

"No significant strength increases were found for failure training versus non-failure training (ES = 0.05, p = 0.73)" (corrected)

That being said, I do agree the article could use with some more studies and clearer language. Cheers — Avelludo (Talk / Contribs / Log) 03:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Humanities[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 September 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mtpride07 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Mtpride07 (talk) 23:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]