Talk:Treaty of Washington (1900)

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chronologically appropriate map

This edit caught my eye; it removed a map showing the current baselines and observed, "Seems like a more chronologically appropriate map would be more useful." With that in mind, the territory ceded to the US is described in Article 3 of the Treaty of Paris (1898) as:

A line running from west to east along or near the twentieth parallel of north latitude, and through the middle of the navigable channel of Bachi, from the one hundred and eighteenth (118th) to the one hundred and twenty-seventh (127th) degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, thence along the one hundred and twenty seventh (127th) degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich to the parallel of four degrees and forty five minutes (4 [degree symbol] 45']) north latitude, thence along the parallel of four degrees and forty five minutes (4 [degree symbol] 45') north latitude to its intersection with the meridian of longitude one hundred and nineteen degrees and thirty five minutes (119 [degree symbol] 35') east of Greenwich, thence along the meridian of longitude one hundred and nineteen degrees and thirty five minutes (119 [degree symbol] 35') east of Greenwich to the parallel of latitude seven degrees and forty minutes (7 [degree symbol] 40') north, thence along the parallel of latitude of seven degrees and forty minutes (7 [degree symbol] 40') north to its intersection with the one hundred and sixteenth (116th) degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, thence by a direct line to the intersection of the tenth (10th) degree parallel of north latitude with the one hundred and eighteenth (118th) degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and thence along the one hundred and eighteenth (118th) degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich to the point of beginning.

and this article says that the treaty that is its topic modified that to include "belonging to the Philippine Archipelago" and, particularly, "the islands of Cagayan [Mapun], Sulu and Sibutu and their dependencies". Islands of Cagayan would be the Batanes, I think; Sulu and Sibutu are easily identified and would include Tawi-Tawi, I think.

Does anyone here have the skills to produce such a map, perhaps distinguishing the area originally ceded from the islands added by differences in color?

Perhaps some more research and discussion here are needed -- in particular, what about the Island of Palmas? Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Map 1 at Philippines: | Archipelagic and other Maritime Claims and Boundaries (PDF) (Report). Limits in the Seas. U.S. Department of State | Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs. September 15, 2014. p. 9. {{cite report}}: External link in |series= (help) Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]