Talk:Treehouse of Horror XXV/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Johanna (talk · contribs) 02:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Third on my "to review" list. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 02:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Comments from reviewer
[edit]- In the image's caption, I would expand upon what it depicts?
- Why is the showrunner necessary for the infobox?
- This seems to be the standard method for Simpsons episodes. See the Featured Articles Lisa the Vegetarian and Homer's Enemy. Even though this is necessarily a season rather than episode detail, some episodes are holdovers from the previous season, such as FA-Class Cape Feare, which was part of the Jean-Reiss season 4 production run but broadcast in David Mirkin's season 5 '''tAD''' (talk) 09:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- That's fine. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 23:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Add more from the production section into the lead.
- Done (I can add more if more is needed) '''tAD''' (talk) 09:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- You have a duplicate link to Homer in the synopsis.
- "The segment ends with the original version of Homer unsuccessfully trying to photograph a good portrait of the two families together, a direct homage to the short "Family Portrait" from The Tracey Ullman Show." How do we know this?
- Removed as OR '''tAD''' (talk) 09:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- In Production, why is the first paragraph only one sentence long?
- Paragraphs merged '''tAD''' (talk) 09:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- I would sprinkle in the EW ref maybe one more time throughout the para (after the direct quote perhaps)--it just makes things better for appearances.
- Duplicate links here include Stanley Kubrick and A Clockwork Orange (film) (from the lead) and Eyes Wide Shut (from the synopsis)
- Done. As far as I know it is acceptable to have links repeated from the lead and image captions '''tAD''' (talk) 09:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Link to "Super Franchise Me" where you say "the previous week's episode."
- Done (without WP:EGG) '''tAD''' (talk) 09:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Are these the only reviews you could find?
- I can indeed look for more, although it's more about what they say rather than how many we have '''tAD''' (talk) 09:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Put in a critical consensus sentence as well as things that critics tended to like and dislike about the episode.
@The Almightey Drill: Nice work! Just a few things to fix before I can pass. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 04:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- @The Almightey Drill: Good work! I'm satisfied enough to pass now. If you get a chance, could you review one of my Veronica Mars articles up at GAN. If you can't, it's okay. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 23:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: