Talk:Triple talaq

--Striver 23:50, 16 July (UTC) Sakina Asghar (20 july 2001) a student of University of Delhi had given her views regarding the triple talaq. she made this clear in an interview with DD channel that triple talaq has nothing to do with the shia community as divorce is a very difficult process in shia muslim.she is greatly influenced by Dr sayed Ammar Nakshawani and she explained it with all the facts based on sayed 's lecture. all the facts based on sayed 's lecture. other students also expressed their thought and claimed triple talaq as an evil.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.69.245.132 (talk) 16:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

triple Talaq has to happen on three different occasions

Note: From 22 August 2017 Supreme court of India declared Triple talaq Illegal in India. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.227.224.58 (talk) 07:32, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Divorce is once at a time, even if I say in anger: "I divorce you" 15 times not 3, it still counts as one, there is a misunderstanding about the INSTANT Triple talaq and is considered a Bid'ah ,it is explained better in sura Al-Baqara 227 to 230 .

This Qur'anic passage explains that the act of divorce has to happen on three seperate occasions and most scholars say that a divorce in the heat of anger and the husband says : "I divorce you" it is not binding.

Qur'an chapter 2 to 227 to 230 explain:

227. And if they decide upon divorce, then Allâh is All-Hearer, All-Knower.

228. And divorced women shall wait (as regards their marriage) for three menstrual periods, and it is not lawful for them to conceal what Allâh has created in their wombs, if they believe in Allâh and the Last Day. And their husbands have the better right to take them back in that period, if they wish for reconciliation. And they (women) have rights (over their husbands as regards living expenses) similar (to those of their husbands) over them (as regards obedience and respect) to what is reasonable, but men have a degree (of responsibility) over them. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

229. The divorce is twice, after that, either you retain her on reasonable terms or release her with kindness. And it is not lawful for you (men) to take back (from your wives) any of your Mahr (bridal-money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage) which you have given them, except when both parties fear that they would be unable to keep the limits ordained by Allâh (e.g. to deal with each other on a fair basis). Then if you fear that they would not be able to keep the limits ordained by Allâh, then there is no sin on either of them if she gives back (the Mahr or a part of it) for her Al-Khul‘ (divorce)[2]. These are the limits ordained by Allâh, so do not transgress them. And whoever transgresses the limits ordained by Allâh, then such are the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers).

230. And if he has divorced her (the third time), then she is not lawful unto him thereafter until she has married another husband. Then, if the other husband divorces her, it is no sin on both of them that they reunite, provided they feel that they can keep the limits ordained by Allâh. These are the limits of Allâh, which He makes plain for the people who have knowledge. --The Brain 07:32, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tell That to Umar and his followers. Shia agree. --Striver 21:48, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was raised Sunni, they (most) consider it Haraam and has been the subject of comedy abd satire by many sunnis--The Brain 22:55, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but that dosnt change that there are Sunis that deem it Halal. --Striver 16:16, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure whether it's worth linking the msnbc article about the man who accidentally divorced his wife, but I thought it was interesting. The link is [1]

Translation=

I removed this string of Arabic text and placed it here. If someone can translate it (and it's relevant to the article), please do so and place it back in the article. K e rowyn ^{Leave a note} 04:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

وَقَدْ اِخْتَلَفَ الْعُلَمَاء فِيمَنْ قَالَ لِامْرَأَتِهِ أَنْتَ طَالِق ثَلَاثًا فَقَالَ الشَّافِعِيّ وَمَالِك وَأَبُو حَنِيفَة وَأَحْمَد وَجَمَاهِير الْعُلَمَاء مِنْ السَّلَف وَالْخَلَف : يَقَع الثَّلَاث

There is difference of opinion for a person who says his wife you are divorced thrice, Shafa'e, Malik, Abu-Hanifa, Ahmad and most(jamhur) ulama of sulf and khulf (means past) says three (tlaaqs) will take effect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.154.26.248 (talk) 10:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

blatent POV intro

I've removed the blatent POV intro. Here it is for those who want to review it (I've abridged the quotes):

(...Quote...)

This verse is self-explanatory: there is no concept of three divorces in Islam. It is after the second divorce that a man can retain his wife or get separated. The concept Of "Three Divorces" does not exist in the Quran.

The concept of "triple Talaq in one sitting" or "Instant Talaq" is alien to the Quran. The misconception that issuing "so called Three Talaqs in one sitting" will terminate ''nikah'' (marriage) and will result in irrevocable talaq is nothing but mockery of the laws. The Holy Quran explicitly lays down principles for talaq and marital discord as follows:

Surah Nisah ....4:35... (...Quote...)

In this ayat of Surah Nisa, Allah clearly asks for arbitration and reconcillation with the help of relatives. Therefore,it is clear that no Talaq can be effective without their interference, whether given once, twice, thrice or a hundred times.

The Surah Talaq Verses 1-12 (...Quote...)

Thus, it is clear from the above surah that the concept of "Three Divorces" does not exist in the Quran. The concept of triple talaq in one go was just an innovation by Caliph Umar and doesn't find any place in the Holy Quran.

The scholars and religious bodies who validate triple talaq in one sitting (without arbitration, reconciliation, and many other conditions as required in the Quran) need to learn that the Laws of Allah are above sayings of any Caliph. Even if it served during the reign of a caliph it can not be applicable to for all times to come, as it is only the Quran which is to be followed for all time.

Here is an abridged version;

The Quran is self-explanitory on the matter. There is no concept of three divorces in Islam.
The concept Of "Three Divorces" does not exist in the Quran.
The concept of "triple Talaq in one sitting" or "Instant Talaq" is alien to the Quran.
It is clear that no Talaq can be effective without interference of reconciliation.
It is clear from a quote that the concept of "Three Divorces" does not exist in the Quran.
The concept of triple talaq in one go doesn't find any place in the Holy Quran.

The concept of triple talaq in one go was just an innovation by Caliph Umar. The scholars and religious bodies who validate triple talaq need to learn [despite being scholars, and reputable religious bodies not merely a single pov-pushing wikipedia editor] that the Laws of Allah are above sayings of any Caliph.

It should be fairly obvious why this is a blatent pov-rant. Hence why I've removed it. Newman Luke (talk) 02:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

There is a merge discussion here Pass a Method talk 13:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]