Talk:Trombiculosis

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Dermatology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Trombiculosis.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

comment

"Some claim that the chigger is still in the bite, perhaps mistaking the tiny red center of the bite for the chigger itself. So in some cases, the chigger is still present when the bite appears." The first sentence suggests that the chigger is actually gone, so the second sentence seems inconsistent. Can someone find a reference to clear this up? 76.126.69.183 (talk) 23:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reference requires sign-in

The Baumann citation from Archives of Internal Medicine requires a sign-in to view. Can someone advise me how to correctly add a note about this? I'm a complete novice here.Learningluvr (talk) 01:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad references

The references in the ==Treatment== section don't seem to be supporting what is being stated and need to be check and likely replaced. RJFJR (talk) 13:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]