Jump to content

Talk:Tropical Storm Fabio (2006)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 6, 2008Good article nomineeListed
June 29, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
June 6, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Fabio (2006)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 18:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • The external link dead links
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Refs 9 and 10 should have the publisher information after the title.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

There is one minor issue with references and one with MOS, so I am putting the article on hold to allow you time to deal with these. If you have any questions, drop me a note here or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 18:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since Hurricanehink is on a break, or as stated by his userpage, I've gone ahead and fixed the three things you've stated. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for helping out! Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article to GA status. Dana boomer (talk) 20:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

[edit]

The article is rather bare-bones, even though it was a GA. I know I created it, but all of its impact was from its remnants. It wasn't that significant as a TC. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to a floods article. YE Pacific Hurricane 04:13, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why? The remnants did next to nothing. A bit of heavy rainfall and some minor flooding is not worthy of an article. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)\[reply]
Fine, then, merge it if you feel it must go. YE Pacific Hurricane 04:32, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge --12george1 (talk) 16:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I guess this one fell through the cracks. Would anyone mind if I merged it? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tropical Storm Fabio (2006)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Mention the rain and flooding in the lead. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:46, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:46, 25 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tropical_Storm_Fabio_(2006)&oldid=1137269099"