Talk:Tunisian–Algerian War (1694)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tunisia, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Tunisia. For more information, visit the project page.TunisiaWikipedia:WikiProject TunisiaTemplate:WikiProject TunisiaTunisia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Algeria

	Algeria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Algeria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Algeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AlgeriaWikipedia:WikiProject AlgeriaTemplate:WikiProject AlgeriaAlgeria articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: National / African / Ottoman / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	African military history task force
	Ottoman military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

September 2023

M. Bitton, stop reverting edits that contain valid sources. Try actually READING the sources that we have provided, instead of reverting them without a valid explanation. Yousefsw07 (talk) 01:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A valid explanation was provided, so you assertion is baseless.

we have provided How many of you are there? M.Bitton (talk) 11:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The explanation you provided just tells me you didn’t even look through the sources. They weren’t sourced correctly but u could still access the sources. Please go and look through the sources I had provided, you will see that Tripolitania did in fact intervene in the war. By “we” I was talking about the other people who have previously mentioned tripolitanias involvement (some with sources) in the war but have been reverted by you aswell as some other users. Yousefsw07 (talk) 22:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Belated comments:

Yousefsw07, in the future, please use citation templates when adding sources and include full bibliographical details in them, including the page numbers where the source supports your edit. You should also consider including a relevant quote from the source, especially for controversial edits or for sources that are not fully accessible to everyone. If you only provide bare URLs with no details, it's unreasonable to expect other editors to find the information for you. We already know from your edits, your comments, and from this previous discussion that you have a specific POV, so you should expect extra scrutiny.
That said, I have checked one of the sources provided in this edit, "Tunisia Since the Arab Conquest" (Abadi 2013), and it does appear to support a Tripolitanian involvement, on p. 207. Here is the passage for convenience:

Ibn Shukr, however, persisted in his plan and brought the proposal to Sh’abān Khuja Dey, the new ruler of Algiers, who promised the dey financial rewards and warned him about the aggressive intentions of the Bey of Tunis towards Constantine and Tripolitania. Persuaded by what Ibn Shukr said, the Algerian dey not only agreed but also convinced the pasha of Tripoli to send a squadron to Bône in order to join the alliance against the Muradite bey of Tunis (1694). In the summer of 1694, the allied army invaded the Regency and defeated the forces of Muhammad Bey, which were besieged in Tunis. The three-month siege ended with the fall of the capital and the flight of Muhammad Bey to the Sahara in November of that year. (...)

Before editing the article again, please establish a consensus on how to proceed. (As M.Bitton mentioned, it's not covered in the article.) R Prazeres (talk) 03:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like the source used does mention Tripolitania's involvement. It mentions that the Algerian dey convinced the pasha of Tripoli to assist him with the invasion of Tunis. It even refers to them as the "allied army". I may be mistaken and please correct me if I am. TheHistorian100 (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does it not claim that Tripolitania was involved? TheHistorian100 (talk) 04:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]