I'm sorry to be bothering you with this but could you please explain why this synopsis is a problem?
Jenpeng 16:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- The article fails to assert the notability of the work. In addition, the tone is that of a blurb or advertisement, rather than an explanation of why the work is notable enough to deserve an article in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a publisher's catalog. If the work is notable (not synonymous with "reviewed in The Times"), someone without a conflict of interest should be writing about it.--Orange Mike 17:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)