Talk:Two to the Fifth
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of [[Category:Book stubs]] on the article page.
- If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
- If you disagree with this assessment, please:
- Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Books/Assessment#Quality scale;
- Remove the stub template from the article.
Copyright review.
[edit]The entire plot introduction was a copy-paste from another site. While in quotes and attributed, the size of it meant that over 90% of the text of the article consisted of a quote from a source. That alone is sufficient reason to remove it, but I also note the source is identified as " an attack page" by my browser, so the reference will be removed as well.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 12:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Two to the Fifth page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Two to the Fifth" page.