Talk:Twproject

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Objection to deletion tag:

I object to the deletion of this page. It is referenced on another Wikipedia page (comparison of Project Mangement Software) and is a short summary that gave me exactly what I needed as I researched this and other similar packages. To me it does not read as an advertisement as claimed, but rather as a short factual summary of product features. While this is a matter open to interpretaiton, to be fair numerous other short summaries would also have to be deleted and they are not so marked. In additon I feel doing so would degrade the purpose of Wikipedia as a reference. As such, I have removed the delete tag.

Regarding the comment on how the page "sprung full blown complete" with info boxes fully populated ... I will say that if I were to create a new page on software I certainly would grab a similar page to use as a template, editing and fully populating info boxes before posting. That's just makes sense from an efficiency perspective. To criticize that method and use it as an argument for deletion ... well, doens't make sense.

That being said, more info would be nice ... however I do not today have time to research and document/reference additioanl info to improve this page. Maybe someday I can work to improve many of these similar short summaries, but I do not have the spare time at the moment.

The author of the bot that inserted the delete tag can verify my profile, research my identity and postings on Wikipedia ... and hopefully believe that I am not being paid to preseve this page (no spam or commerical intent here). It truly was coincidence that I was searching for PM software for my company (Ashlar Technologies) and just happened to see, and object to, the deletion tag within its 7 day window.

--JRuby (talk) 17:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rename article?

It seems to me that this article refers almost entirely to a program called "twproject" and this clashes with another project management application actually called Teamwork, which is rising in popularity and will probably end up needing a Wiki page at some point. Should we have it renamed so that work on the article for the other product can begin? 86.43.118.26 (talk) 09:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to make the move. I've already set up a redirect and I've changed the links to this page, now (soon) I'm going to move the content. U2fanboi (talk) 08:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page should be deleted

The page has no references and earlier hosted a pure promotional material. It should be deleted as it adds no value.Katyaan (talk) 06:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]