Jump to content

Talk:Type U 66 submarine/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Guess I'll take this one too! Review should be up soon... Dana boomer (talk) 19:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    For boats #66 and 69, you say that German records do not agree with British records on the fate of the boats. What, then, do the German records say happened to the boats?
    I made it explicit for each that the official German fate for the subs is unknown. — Bellhalla (talk) 13:44, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just one issue with prose, so I am putting this article on hold. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:05, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]