Jump to content

Talk:Typhoon Lynn/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 02:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well-written:
  • After several grammatical adjustments, the article now complies with MOS policies on grammar, layout and structure. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 02:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
  • Verifiable with no original research:
  • The article contains a sizable bibliography of reliable publications. No signs of original research; the sources are made frequent use of in the text. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
    (c) it contains no original research
  • Broad in its coverage:
  • The article provides a thorough supply of encyclopedic information on the topic. Nothing looks to be trivial. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 22:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  • The article presents its coverage of the topic in a neutral tone. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 22:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  • According to the revision history, the article has not suffered from any disruptive editing in all its current existence. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 17:13, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  • The article's three images are all validly licensed, and all serve relevant purposes for illustration. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 17:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

    Though it has taken a lot longer than I should have let it, after reading the article over twice for good measure, and checking it against the criteria, I am satisfied it qualifies for GA-status. Congratulations! One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 02:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]