Talk:USS Bowen

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Name?

I am not sure this ship was named after Admiral Bowen, given that no other officer of the era received such an honor, as far as I know. Might it have been named after an earlier Bowen? Please provide a source for this info. Thanks. Ssvonavec 03:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USS Bowen was named after Vice Admiral Harold G. Bowen, Sr. (1883-1965), not after his son, Vice Admiral Harold G. Bowen, Jr. Source: Commissioning ceremony press kit. --88.14.179.157 (talk) 18:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Janel Hopkins Boiler Technician 3rd Class USS BOWEN (FF-1079 and FFT-1079) Why is there no mention of the history that was made when allowing 10-12 females serve aboard a Fast Frigate combatant ship, starting in February 1992? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.67.225.248 (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]