Jump to content

Talk:USS Concord (PG-3)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Below is my review of the article:

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    1. Lead: I would personally keep the lead maximum of 3 paragraphs.
    2. Discrepancy in date of laying down: Lead and text say it to be March 1888; the infobox says it is May 1888.
    3. Discrepancy in date of launch: lead says, March 1890; the main text says March 1889.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Rest everything looks fine. There were a few 'on's missing before the dates. I inserted them. Thanks - DSachan (talk) 09:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]