Talk:United Regions of Serbia/Archive 1

Archive 1

File:Urs.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Urs.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Urs.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:37, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

URS vs. G17 Plus

Partial c/p from Talk:Serbian parliamentary election, 2014#Disputed Infobox:

ElectPartei - The United Regions of Serbia were founded and officially registered as a political party in no earlier than 2013. Therefore Mlađan Dinkić cannot be a leader earlier than that, and for the sake of consistency, it is my opinion that we shouldn't base it off of an electoral list of a coalition led by G17+ that had existed in the previous election, just like we don't calculate together MP seats of political parties that in the meantime joined others (but where distinct at the time of the last election).

Nikgudz - We all know in Serbia that URS is successor of G17+ and that URS participated in Elections 2012. So it is not new party de facto. They were coalition but with all elements of party. Only formaly they established in 2013. But that should not be the most important. They are not new, we all know them for 3 or 4 years.

Sundostund - As for URS, their establishment as a party in 2013 was only a formality. They were founded in 2010 and gradually superseded G17+. They already had de facto party structure when they participated in the 2012 elections. Being part of Serbian political life since 2010, they certainly aren't a "new party".

Lukitrans - Agree with Sundostund and Nikgudz, it's the same party so I don't see why argue again about something that has already been discussed during the Elections. — Preceding undated comment added 12:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

How about you provide an actual coherent argument based on, you know, facts. As well as address the arguments I have listed below before unilaterally editing the article when I specially asked for a consensus be made first. Buttons (talk) 05:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: While it can be argued that the URS is the de facto successor of the G17 Plus, we cannot include events (such as past elections, leadership, etc.) that occurred in the latter in this article. Its completely nonsensical considering that the URS was formed by more than just one party. In that regard I support ElectPartei's opinion, over the two below them, in keeping these two separate. If anyone disagrees with this assessment, form a consensus here first before changing the article. No edit-wars. Buttons (talk) 01:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)