Talk:Urenui

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Urenui be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Taranaki may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

Hi Boethius. Please say rude things about the Urenui golf course building its 12th hole right next to the marker of Te Rangi Hīroa's birthplace. It must get clipped pretty often. And I was sure that I remembered it being closer to the domain road and further from the river than it now is. He pokokohua rātou! Mention the marae (I think it's the main one for Ngāti Mutunga). I think the marae is just called Urenui, but I'm not sure.—Koro Neil (talk) 14:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: the golf course

Thanks for taking the time to read the page, at least. It's rather unbalanced on the side of resources vs. actual text at the moment - but, like you, I haven't got actual access to the resources: so I'm not really able to write the article.

Now - to the golf course. A couple of observations.

1. This is an encyclopaedia - and not really a place for the advocacy of local issues: no matter how just or heartfelt. IOW, we gotta be neutral - and it's difficult to see how such an issue would affect or interest a reader from the other side of the world as being important enough to be in an encyclopaedia. It's very difficult to write an article without what Wikipedia call a POV (or Point of View), and, should I include such an addition as you suggest, the article stub might just get flagged, flamed, or vandalised. Or deleted entirely.

2. It's taken me the best part of a day to locate, collate, and hand-code the resource list that I've added to this article stub. I don't want it all destroyed (or reverted, as the Wikipedia community call it) because of a perceived lapse in judgment.

So - how to resolve this? One suggestion comes to mind...

1. You could make a note in Te Rangi Hiroa's biography that the local golf club has done what it has done. Non-pejoratively... Something like...

"Interestingly, the Urenui Golf Club has.... "

And just state what they've done. If someone makes a comment thereafter, that's most likely the time that the issue can be discussed and an appropriate annotation may or may not be made... :)

Eirenically,

Boethius65 (talk) 06:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Long list of items for further reading

Wikipedia is an on line encyclopedia, and an article should provide content of notable information, not just a list of references or items in a museum somewhere. This article has a very long list of external references, and the relevance of many of these is not clear. If the content of any of the items listed under Further Reading is notable and relevant to the article, this should be summarised and added to the article. But (IMHO) this article is not the place for a long list of references and museum items. --Pakaraki (talk) 19:21, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology?

No mention of the fact that the town's name translates to "large penis"? Muzilon (talk) 08:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]