Talk:Vertical integration

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Business (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Economics (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Unititled[edit]

LOL NOOBS keting. Perhaps the original author would like to provide some attribution? --malber 15:42, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Maybe I am reading in to the definition, but it seems to be slanted towards the witer's opinions. Microsoft? A better example would have been the movie studios in their heyday. They made the pictures, they had huge stables of contracted actors, producers and writers, they owned movie theaters in which they would only show their movies.

A complete mess[edit]

The whole article is atrociously written. There's hardly a sentence without a grammatical error. The ones with fewer errors are out of context. I can't make head or tails of it. Please rewrite this article as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.64.38.249 (talk) 23:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

The article is still poorly structured. It makes it difficult to expand because its tricky to slot new text in. I don't like the prominence given to the examples. Yes they should be outlined with some detail but it has to be balanced. I am not familiar enough with the subject to suggest a new heading structure however I feel that should be remedied as a priority. - Shiftchange (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Vertical integration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)