Talk:Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Economics (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Game theory (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Game theory. We need your help!
Join in | Fix a red link | Add content | Weigh in
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.


Interesting citations. "Science of teh Interwebs"? Assignment solutions? Perhaps a more trustworthy source would be useful ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes, very suspicious... We should find something better, apart from Algorithmic Game Theory... I'll look at Combinatorial Auctions and try to fix it... Pallida  Mors 18:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
The source is Professor Luis von Ahn, who is well known in the field, and has a... different teach style. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
The source is actually Section 15.4 of "Networks, Crowds, and Markets Reasoning About a Highly Connected World"

by David Easley and Jon Kleinberg. Luis von Ahn took his solution proof almost verbatim from this book. Anyway the citation links are dead.

Linking to the foorball match "VCG" animation example is a bad choice:[edit]

Specifically, the animation describes the "straightforward" extension of the Vickrey auction to multiple items, which is _not_ VCG and suffers from not being incentive compatible (truthful). The animation is flawed in claiming that k winners paying the price of the k+1 bidder corresponds to the VCG outcome. (talk) 19:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

hyphens in URL[edit]

Must we use "Vickrey–Clarke–Groves_auction" for the link to this article? The "–" characters in the name are not the same as keyboard-entry "-" characters and cause a lot of pain in encoding them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ergotius (talkcontribs) 14:37, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Unless there have been some changes in the style guidelines, we must use the n-dash (–), per WP:DASH. There should be a redirect from Vickrey-Clarke-Groves auction; if there isn't, there will be, shortly. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Too technical[edit]

This could really use an example in English, that does not use mathematical symbols. -- Beland (talk) 22:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Groves–Ledyard mechanism[edit]

The French and Italian Wikipedias present in their corresponding articles a generalization know as the Groves–Ledyard mechanism, which is said to be a much more general schema, giving the following references:

  • Groves Th. and Ledyard J. (1977), "Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the "Free Rider" Problem", Econometrica, vol. 45, 1977, pp. 783-809.
  • Groves, T. and J. Ledyard (1987), "Incentive Compatibility since 1972", in: Th. Groves and R. Radner (1987) (Eds.), Essays in Honor of Leonid Hurwicz. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1987.

It will be appreciated if someone who is reasonably familiar with this kind of stuff could expand the article.  --Lambiam 17:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)