Talk:Victoria of Coburg

Requested move

Of course I support the move from Victoria of Coburg to Victoria of Saxe-Coburg. Arrigo 21:34, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Oppose move, for reasons explained below --Francis Schonken 08:31, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Vote count report, 9 days after start of vote

Two persons voted, one for the move, one against it, summary:

• 1 vote out of 2 supporting move = 50% <60%, conclusion: No Move

Implemented result of vote, trying to help out with WP:RM backlog, and remove the topic there. --Francis Schonken 08:31, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Additional comments

(from WP:RM, under section header "===19 September 2005===":)

• Talk:Victoria of Coburg — Victoria of Coburg → Victoria of Saxe-Coburg – presumably not a controversial move. Admin help needed as the target address has edit history. Arrigo 22:55, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Silliness, the content of Victoria of Coburg is less than 24h old, all by Arrigo (apart from a minor tweak by StanZegel) - So Arrigo can move the content if he wants to be known as the author of "Victoria of Saxe-Coburg", no "edit history" lost; the admin move would even be more detrimental to edit histories, while that would involve destruction of edit history of one of the pages - Arrigo moving the content would destroy neither edit history. --Francis Schonken 00:39, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Victoria of Coburg and Victoria of Saxe-Coburg redirect to Princess Victoria now. Talk:Victoria of Coburg and Talk:Victoria of Saxe-Coburg both redirect to Talk:Princess Victoria. So vote redundant. --Francis Schonken 10:48, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Further, it has to be mentioned that Arrigo moved one of the two pages of this vote a few hours after he had proposed the vote (diff), which is gaming the system --Francis Schonken 12:39, 21 September 2005 (UTC)