Jump to content

Talk:Villa Road/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Amitchell125 (talk · contribs) 16:25, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review the article. AM

Thanks for taking it on, I've notified 86.141.148.236 who has made some recent edits in case they want to participate as well. Mujinga (talk) 08:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know, note that comments will still only be addressed to you. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:18, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review comments

[edit]

Lead section

[edit]
  • The third image, which shows terrace in the distance, seems purely decorative, as it doesn’t illustrate any part of the text. I wouldn’t include it here.
    I haven't made it very clear but the image is showing Max Roach Park which was created after the demolition of one side of Villa Road ... I'll have a think how to make the link more obvious Mujinga (talk) 15:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I found a source to make the link more explicit and moved the pic down to be next to that part of the text Mujinga (talk) 16:33, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely better. I've moved the image up a bit so it doesn't go into the next section, please revert if you wish. Amitchell125 (talk) 16:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yes I was confused by that as I made my last edit ("did I realy place it there and not below?" haha). Great, I've answered everything so back to you Mujinga (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestion (not GA) - make a multiple image at the top? (use Template:Multiple image). AM
Understood, but in those days, being a single mother in Britain was considered in a different light from the way it is nowadays, an attitude that was even more prevalent decades earlier (see here for where I am coming from). Some sort of explanation for why they were considered in this way might be useful, perhaps as a separate note. Amitchell125 (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1 History

[edit]

2 Squatted

[edit]
In which case I think it would make more sense to move this sentence to the Popular culture section. Amitchell125 (talk) 16:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More comments to follow. AM

[edit]

4 References

[edit]
Understood. AM
  • BBC – ‘BBC News’ (also in italics, consider linking).
Understood, that for pointing that out to me. AM
No worries. AM

5 Further reading

[edit]

On hold

[edit]

I'm putting the article on hold for a week until 14 August to allow time for the issues raised to be addressed. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 09:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Passing

[edit]

Passing the article now, it's well into GA territory. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 17:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.