Talk:Virginia State Route 175/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: West Virginian (talk · contribs) 18:08, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Dough4872, I will engage in thorough and comprehensive review of this article within the next 48 hours. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime. Thanks! -- West Virginian (talk) 18:08, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Dough4872, I've completed a thorough, thoughtful, and comprehensive review and re-review of this article and I find that it exceeds the criteria for passage to Good Article status. Before it passes, I do have some comments and suggestions that should be addressed first. Thank you for your many quality contributions to Wikipedia! -- West Virginian (talk) 18:22, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Lede
- Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, the lede of this article adequately defines Virginia State Route 175, establishes Virginia State Route 175's necessary context, and explains why Virginia State Route 175 is otherwise notable.
- The info box for the Virginia State Route 175 is beautifully formatted and its content is sourced within the prose of the text and by the references cited therein.
- The map of Virginia State Route 175 is licensed CC BY-SA 3.0 and is therefore acceptable for use here in this article.
- The lede is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no further comments or questions for this section.
Route description
- Consider also including an inline citation to the USGS topographic map for this area, as an additional reference. I've included the citation for both quadrangles that cover SR 175 below:
- Chincoteague West Quadrangle – Virginia – Accomack Co (Map). 1 : 24,000. 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic). United States Geological Survey. 1965. OCLC 25151198.
- Hallwood Quadrangle – Virginia – Maryland (Map). 1 : 24,000. 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic). United States Geological Survey. 1968. OCLC 28492197.
- Added references. Dough4872 01:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- The image of the Whealton Memorial Causeway between the mainland and Chincoteague is licensed CC BY-SA 2.0 and is therefore acceptable for use here in this article.
- The first mention of SR 175 in the main prose beginning in this section should begin with at least one mention of the highway by its full name: Virginia State Route 175.
- This section is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no further comments or questions for this section.
History
- This section is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no comments or questions for this section.
Major intersections
- While this table is beautifully formatted, I suggest including an inline citation at the header of each column so that all its content is properly sourced.
- Added refs to headers (the km header does not get a ref since it is a conversion from the miles, which is referenced). Dough4872 01:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
SR 175Y
- This section is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no comments or questions for this section.
- The table is also beautifully formatted and its contents are cited and verifiable.
- Thanks for the review, I have replied above. Dough4872 01:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Dough4872, thank you for thoughtfully addressing these comments in a timely manner. I hereby pass this article to Good Article status. Congratulations on a job well done! -- West Virginian (talk) 02:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, I have replied above. Dough4872 01:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)