Talk:Visa versa

I don't believe that "visa versa" is a valid Latin phrase in this context. It doesn't appear in the full list of Latin phrases to which it redirects, and is found in no dictionary that I have searched through OneLook [1] (except for the Wikipedia entry, which is why I'm here ;)), reinforcing that belief.

It's almost certainly an error for "vice versa", IMHO, but I don't think "visa versa" should be allowed to stand as a Wikipedia entry as it is. AncientBrit 17:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)