Talk:Vityaz

Recent major edits

In a recent edit, much of the explanatory information and several of the properly-sourced listings on this disambiguation page were removed. I don't see what benefit was attained by making any of the changes since revision 302176892, what looks like the most complete revision to me. Can User:Altenmann or someone else explain why the more recent revision is preferable? Thanks! Avram (talk) 07:22, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig pages are navigational pages of terse style, with minimal explanations, sufficient to distinguish subjects from each other, rather than to completely define the subjects. I also deleted some items which have to wikipedia articles or links. See wikipedia:Disambiguation and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). If you still have specific questions about particular items, please list them explicitely. - Altenmann >t 14:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This word is not derived from Old German but Old Slavonic and South slavic - Vitec, Vitek-Marko, a born from a dragon hero and a Dragonfighter Zmeeborez. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.215.95.22 (talk) 21:04, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]