Talk:Vortex Bladeless

This page reads like an advert for generating investor hype rather than an encyclopedia article. Appropriate criticism of the idea should be included.

https://cleantechnica.com/2015/05/21/bladeless-wind-turbine-reality-check/ - for example

Comments in the page like

> more similar in features to solar power than to regular wind power

read like breathless hype and should be converted into something more meaningful - e.g. "designed for local production for individual consumers" - however that directly brings out the criticism (see source) that the systems are inherently too small to ever be economical.

I feel like StacksofHoy is just trying to create hate towards the project with unexisting problems. Solar or wind power features are not better or worse. Each one has its pros and cons. Therefore, no hype is created. It just states an objective fact. He also uses subjective statements as "the systems are inherently too small to ever be economical" which are not true since they are assuming that the project will not be economically viable in any possible future. StacksofHoy cannot predict the future so he is giving his own opinion about something that could be possible. 83.54.24.119 (talk) 21:55, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

> moves an alternator that generates the electricity with no moving parts in contact

needs more explanation with a picture. Does it mean that a magnet moves inside a coil? How does it overcome lack of efficiency through bad spacing of components without physical contact?

StacksofHoy (talk) 11:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advert