Jump to content

Talk:W.T.F. (South Park)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CTJF83 GoUSA 04:47, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Alt text
  • I guess in my other reviews I didn't pay attention to it saying it was rated MA...I think it should be is rated because it always has the same rating every time it airs, thoughts?
    • I'm sorry but I'm a bit confused. The rating is shown right now. Are you saying it should be or shouldn't be? — Hunter Kahn 15:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • Do you think it should be present tense? ""W.T.F." was written and directed by series co-creator Trey Parker, and was rated TV-MA L in the United States." Do you think it should said and is rated TV-MA L, or is it ok how it is? CTJF83 GoUSA 20:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • I guess I'd say it should stay the way it is now, since that tense is consistent with the rest of the article. However, if you feel otherwise, I could change it, or you could feel free to change it yourself... — Hunter Kahn 00:54, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
          • Not a huge deal, just wanted to see your thoughts
  • I'm confused as to why ref 8 has two tables? I believe the SP number is wrong, and should be 1.37 mil viewers....well, please explain the 2 tables to me. Right above the 2nd table it says adults 18-34 but on the 2nd table it says 18-49.
    • You are right, it should have been 1.37. I fixed it. As for the reason for the two tables, it breaks it into the two different age groups, 18-34 and 18-49. Those are two age groups most commonly monitored by Nielsen ratings. In this particular source it only gives the South Park rating for the 18-34 age group. That's why in the first sentence of the Reception section, I make clear that the 1.37 million was from this age group in particular. — Hunter Kahn 15:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CTJF83 GoUSA 06:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]