Talk:WKSU/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ThadeusOfNazereth (talk · contribs) 04:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Hello! I will be reviewing this article and will update this template when the review is completed. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 04:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: I am happy to promote this article! It's comprehensive in its scope and history and is well sourced throughout. My only comment relates to the liberal use of semicolons (which I despise) but they all look grammatically correct and I won't hold up a good article simply because of personal preference.

   Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.