Talk:WUXP-TV/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Bruxton (talk · contribs) 23:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Review
[edit]I am happy to review this one. I will make comments atop the chart with questions or checked sections. Excited to work with you to get this article passed.
Spelling etc.
[edit]In History/The TVX Years should be "station's" for this sentence "The Taft stations purchase left TVX highly".
MT Communications ownership section "it was in second-place to WZTV among" probably should not be hyphenated.
- These two should be fixed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Lead summary
[edit]The facts presented in the lead are repeated and cited in the article with one exception.
This appears in the lead but is not repeated and cited in the body
it is also sister to Dabl affiliate WNAB (channel 58).
- Reworded the lead to avoid this requiring excessive body detail about WNAB. As a "shelled" station (its programming was basically scooped up and ghosted for ownership-related reasons), it's hard to describe it in the lead without too many references. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Images
[edit]The article does not have images. There is a logo which appears to be correctly licensed
Citations
[edit]- History
The TVX years - citations are all correct here
MT Communications ownership - citations are all correct here
Sullivan and Sinclair management Does the first sentence line up with the cite? - I cannot find mention of "purchased WZTV".
- Act III owned WZTV at the time, and the entire company was purchased. See also [1]. (ABRY bought Act III and then formed Sullivan to run the former Act III portfolio). Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Local programming
News and public affairs
Sports
- Technical information
Subchannels
ATSC 3.0
Analog-to-digital conversion
Stable
[edit]Only 22 edits since February 2023 so the article is stable. No warring.
Wording that may need attention
[edit]Lead says "tight market" is that colloquial?
TVX years says "stocked" and "in the running" might both be colloquial
TVX years, "had been chosen, as had a tower site" maybe use "selected"?
TVX years "The station affiliated that fall with the new Fox network" should is be "became" affiliated.
MT Communications ownership, "However, that deal fell apart, and the deal went the other way" the sentence may not be clear and uses colloquial language
- @Bruxton: Fixed all. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Checklist
[edit]Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Yes |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Yes |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Yes |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Yes |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | Yes |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Yes |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Yes |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Yes |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Yes |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Yes |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Yes |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | — |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | I enjoyed reviewing the article! |
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.