This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland
In this version of the article, there is a lot of historical material about the hospital which I had to remove because it was added by a potentially WP:COI editor, and more importantly, was fully uncited. If someone is interested in using this as a base for research and citations, that would be great. Ingolfson (talk) 05:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I commend you on writing a note mentioning the deletion. But really, Wikipedia's gone to shit since "everything must be referenced" became a mantra. Did you have any doubt about the validity of that information? It sounded alright to me, and is better than the stub of an article that is there now.
Did I have doubts? Seriously - no. Do we need to be consistent, or have no defense against being accused of hypocrisy when we remove material which we DO doubt? I think yes. Ingolfson (talk) 08:06, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
