Talk:Walls of Dubrovnik/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Very good.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   No, the citation style is incositent; internet references lack author, access date, publisher, etc. Published works lack city of origin &, in some cases, the its issue date.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Yes, all quotes, statistics, and facts likely to be challenged have been cited.

   C. No original research:

   Nil.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Covers the prominent aspects of its existence.

   B. Focused:

   Yes.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Somewhat. In future avoid words that don't impart facts (e.g. "old") if circumstances allow. But, of course I acknowledge that some older sources can't be coherently dated.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   All in order.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Yes, but does there need to be so many?

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Yes.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   When you address the issues I've raised above then the article shall pass! Best of luck. -- Jack1755 (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)