Talk:Way of the Five Pecks of Rice/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hello, I will be reviewing this article. Check back soon for a full review! Good luck! CarpetCrawler (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

GA passed[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

VERY well written, excellently sourced, and it definitely looks like a lot of hard work was put into this article. I cannot find any problems with it and thought it was a great read! Well done, and congratulations! CarpetCrawler (talk) 21:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)