Jump to content

Talk:Weed (manga)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk contribs count) 19:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    the only problem I have is the word "comrades" being used in the lead; it should be replaced with "friends" or "allies"
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    no problems here
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    well half the legacy section is uncited, where you're telling a plot of the sequel; but it is optional to cite a plot as it is referencing the work itself, so...
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    no problems here
    C. No original research:
    no problems here
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    no problems here
    B. Focused:
    no problems here
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    no problems here
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    no problems here
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    no problems here
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    when listing the cast members in the caption, I'd put "and" before "Rocket"
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    this deserves to be a good article; good job