Talk:Wesleyan University/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nikki♥311 05:46, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I will be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria. Generally, I like to do my reviews in several steps. I like to give some general suggestions for improvement before moving on to more specific suggestions. Here is my first set of improvements:

Quite a bit of this article is unreferenced. There are entire paragraphs and sections without a single reference.
All internet references need to be formatted with Template:cite web.
The majority of the references are primary. Second and third party sources are more reliable and preferred in more cases.

Usually, reviewers give seven days for a nominator to fix the problems before failing or passing an article. This might be a little time consuming, so if real progress is being made, I'll allow more time. Once these suggestions have been addresses, I'll analyze the article more closely and give more specific suggestions. Good luck! Nikki♥311 05:46, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article has failed its Good Article nomination due to lack of response. Feel free to address these primary issues and renominate at a later date. Nikki♥311 02:55, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]