Talk:What's Your Raashee?/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 14:46, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"She tells him that a boy has agreed to marry her, but she is reluctan" — reluctant. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Sanjana shows Devu a picture; when he says something, she becomes angry and tries to leave." — says what? — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The last four do not have role names. Either find out or, at best, remove them. Your call. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you include references which describe the traits of Chopra's characters? It would be better for those who may not know about the film. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My second comment in the "Plot" section is not addressed yet. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes because that conversation is muted in the film. So, what do you want me to add what he said to her?Krish | Talk 07:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the plot, Harman's character, Yogesh, says he doesn't know his sign but in the casting section, you mention that Yogesh is Scorpio? Quite confusing there. Please clarify. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Sanjana asks Yogesh what's her raashee is. I think this was altered during the copy-editing.Krish | Talk 15:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"The vocals were performed by Sen, who appears on most of the songs" — Do you mean "renders"/"performs"? If so, either of those two would be better instead of "appears" unless he made an appearance in the song videos. If that is the case, you can list the songs where he makes his appearances in a footnote. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:51, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Krish!: I'll look at the last three sections tomorrow. Really busy in real life. I apologise for the delay in my review. I'm usually never this slow. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
Pass or Fail:

@Krish!: Couldn't find any fault with the last three sections. Great job! — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 14:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]