This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
So there is a tag proposing a split, would the person who left the tag, or anyone else for that matter, care to put forward some reasons? Beeblbrox (talk) 20:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, they only share a name. Unless there is a source to say that the two were part of a series, it seems reasonable to split them because they are distinct things, like Paris and Paris, Texas. As far as I can tell, Russell and Forster's essays were produced independently, without the intention of them being directly compared, and they cover different subject matter. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:13, 20 March 2011 (UTC)