Talk:White Night riots/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I really enjoyed reading this one. It's well written, and the different sections are knitted together so that the chronology flows logically. You don't always get that, especially without hard work. It is referenced well enough for my liking—not a {{fact}} tag in sight, nor anyplace where I would wish to add one. There are no issues with image use, stability or neutrality. I took Moni3's informal review into account when reading the article, and she does a great job critiquing the coverage. I found it to be broad and detailed in almost every area, though I would love to see improvement in the areas she mentioned, especially the aftermath and legacy sections. I find these parts satisfactory, however, and not a reason in themselves to hold the article. So congrats on your first GA, Firestorm. Good luck at FAC ;) — Jake Wartenberg 19:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)