Talk:William C. Clayton/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 22:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Comments below,

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Issues

• Don't put citations like the this: "aawaaw.[1] bbbwbbbw.[1]"
• Four citations for one point seems excessive
• What illness did he die from?
• Add identifiers for some long cites.

--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

• Tomandjerry211 (alt), I've removed the additional inline citations, and have ensured that no more than three inline citations appear in one instance. The sources do not state what his actual fatal illness was, just that he had suffered from an illness and died. I've also ensured that at least one OCLC or hyphenated ISBN have been added to each of the references. Please let me know if you see any further issues or have any other suggestions! Thank you for your review! -- West Virginian (talk) 08:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

• Passing, well done.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 10:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

• Tomandjerry211 (alt), thank you again for your thoughtful review. I look forward to working with you again soon! -- West Virginian (talk) 12:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)