Talk:Xalapa/GA1
Good Article review[edit]
I am providing this review here, since a formal GA was never started. Please follow the instructions at WP:GAN for any future GA nomination.
This article does not yet meet GA criteria for the following reasons:
- References are still missing in most sections. Every place where there is a hard fact (e.g. statistic, number, date, etc.), a citation to a Reliable Source must be provided, per WP:V.
- Images need to follow the guidelines at WP:MOSIMAGE. Further, it's best if the images are not hard-sized and if they are, they should not hard-sized smaller than 300px.
- Lists, with the exception of sister cities, should be reworked into readable prose. The list of notable people should also include references verifying each person's notability.
- You may want to consider breaking the article down into sub-articles per WP:SUMMARY
Please submit for GA nomination again when ready. Best, epicAdam(talk) 18:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)