Jump to content

Talk:Yeardley Smith/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The article does not have obvious problems that would warrant a quick-fail. decltype (talk) 19:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: Relies heavily on quotations, but it's a very good read.
    B. MoS compliance: Overall very good. It seems a bit odd that the the video game credits is a list while the others are tables. Any specific reason for that?
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects: I was expecting a mention of her role in Ginger Ale Afternoon, even if it's only a small point in her career.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Overall I think the article meets the criteria. On hold pending a response from a main contributor. decltype (talk) 03:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Article passed. decltype (talk) 22:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I turned the video games section into a table. Not sure about Ginger Ale Afternoon. I'll let User:Scorpion0422 or User:Gran2 take care of that. TheLeftorium 09:30, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Of course, WP:DUE applies, but I think a small mention is warranted. decltype (talk) 16:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a small bit about the role. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any direct interviews in which she discusses it (which is why it wasn't mentioned before). -- Scorpion0422 22:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I looked myself but couldn't find anything. I am sure I read one a while back. Anyway, I have now passed the article. Good work. decltype (talk) 22:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]