Talk:You Are Not Alone/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello, I will be reviewing this article for GA candidacy. Check back soon for a review! Thanks and good luck! CarpetCrawler (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
On hold
[edit]The article is on hold. It looks wonderful, it's well-written, fully cited, and accurately referenced. However, I only have one problem. Reference #22 leads to a dead link that says a search session has "expired". Just find another review, or take it out, and this article can be passed. I will give you seven days to fix the article to this review's liking. Thanks, good work and good luck! Please send me a message on my talkpage when you have fixed the article's dead reference. CarpetCrawler (talk) 17:13, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- I could still use it without a direct link though. If it's a published piece in a newspaper, which it is, I can site it with or without a direct link to the online database. I can remove the link if you like but there should be no problem with me using the source like a would when it was published in physical form. However I think the link should remain so that those who do have an account can read it. When we site books and newspapers we don't need web links, here the weblink is a little extra, for those who do have access to the account.— Realist2 17:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oohh, you're right! I forgot that I did the exact same thing with some articles I cited at No Jacket Required, and Phil Collins! Some of the articles I cited weren't available online, so I just left the cites with no direct link. I also see what you mean with leaving the link in. It's true that people who have accounts at the site should also be able to view the articles, as well. So in summary, leave the link in, and feel free to hit me with a trout for forgetting. :P My apologies for the confusion, this article passes! What a wonderful job you've done! CarpetCrawler (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- No problem :-) — Realist2 17:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oohh, you're right! I forgot that I did the exact same thing with some articles I cited at No Jacket Required, and Phil Collins! Some of the articles I cited weren't available online, so I just left the cites with no direct link. I also see what you mean with leaving the link in. It's true that people who have accounts at the site should also be able to view the articles, as well. So in summary, leave the link in, and feel free to hit me with a trout for forgetting. :P My apologies for the confusion, this article passes! What a wonderful job you've done! CarpetCrawler (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)