Telstra Corporation Ltd v Desktop Marketing Systems Pty Ltd
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (November 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Telstra Corporation Limited v Desktop Marketing Systems Pty Ltd  is a 2001 decision of the Federal Court of Australia related to the originality required to attract copyright protection. Heard before Justice Finkelstein in June 2000, the case concerned the release of a product called "Phonedisc" created by the Respondents, Desktop Marketing Systems.
In his decision handed down on 25 May 2001, Justice Finkelstein found that the contents of that product, which allowed the user to perform reverse telephone searches by service number, was almost identical in content to the publicly listed directories, even if some of the content was listed in a different fashion. The court found that Telstra, the Australian owner/publisher of the White Pages and Yellow Pages telephone directories, had copyright in the content of those directories. Consequently, the use of the data by the Respondents constituted copyright infringement, and the product was removed from sale. Furthermore, as a result of this decision, a similar web-based directory called "Blackpages", published by 2600 Australia, also terminated its service.
On the 8th of February, 2010, the decision was overturned in a ruling by Justice Gordon by Telstra v Phone Directories using the precedent of IceTV v Nine Network. The ruling stated that copyright was not applicable to these works as Telstra conceded that there was no identifiable author contributing to the publication, even considering third parties, and hence did not represent a sufficient literary effort to warrant protection. Further considerations were raised regarding the level of collaboration required between staff members to warrant the concept of joint authorship, as well as the level of intellectual effort required to arrange and organise the listings. Subsequently none of the works were established as "original works", noting that there should exist a correlative relationship between originality and authorship.
|This article related to Australian law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|
|This case law article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|