Template:Arbitration case implementation notes/Proposal/testcases
Appearance
This is the template test cases page for the sandbox of Template:Arbitration case implementation notes/Proposal. to update the examples. If there are many examples of a complicated template, later ones may break due to limits in MediaWiki; see the HTML comment "NewPP limit report" in the rendered page. You can also use Special:ExpandTemplates to examine the results of template uses. You can test how this page looks in the different skins and parsers with these links: |
Implementation notes
[edit]Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision—at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion to close the case until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.
These notes were last updated by — Wug·a·po·des 18:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC); the last edit to this page was on 00:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC) by SilverLocust.
Proposed Principles | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Proposal Name | Support | Oppose | Abstain | Status | Support needed | Notes |
1 | Purpose of Wikipedia | 13 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
2 | Healthy and unhealthy conflict | 12 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
3 | Consensus | 0 | 13 | 0 | Cannot pass | ||
4 | Proposed deletion | 13 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
5 | Bludgeoning | 4 | 4 | 1 | Cannot pass | 2 equal first choice; One first choice to 5.1; one second choice to 5.1. As 5.1 is passing so 1 is subtracted and also because 5.1 is passing and 5 is failing, votes marked as equal but only for one lead an extra two to be subtracted | |
5.1 | Bludgeoning | 9 | 2 | 0 | · | 2 equal first choice with 5; One second choice to 5; One first choice to 5. | |
6 | Battleground conduct | 13 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
7 | Repeated behavior | 13 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
Proposed Findings of Fact | |||||||
Number | Proposal Name | Support | Oppose | Abstain | Status | Support needed | Notes |
1 | Locus of dispute: Mass creation of articles | 11 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
2 | Locus of dispute: Conduct at Articles for Deletion | 11 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
3 | 7&6=thirteen | 11 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
4 | Johnpacklambert sanction history | 11 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
5 | Johnpacklambert deletion conduct | 11 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
6 | Lugnuts | 11 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
7 | TenPoundHammer | 11 | 0 | 1 | · | ||
8 | Mass nominations at Articles for Deletion | 12 | 0 | 1 | · | ||
9 | Low quality participation at Articles for Deletion | 7 | 0 | 1 | · | ||
10 | Battleground behavior at Articles for Deletion | 9 | 0 | 1 | · | ||
11 | No evidence for larger issues at Articles for Deletion | 0 | 9 | 1 | · | ||
Proposed Remedies | |||||||
Number | Proposal Name | Support | Oppose | Abstain | Status | Support needed | Notes |
1 | 7&6=thirteen warned | 5 | 2 | 1 | · | ||
2 | 7&6=thirteen topic banned | 8 | 1 | 0 | · | ||
3 | 7&6=thirteen banned | 1 | 5 | 1 | · | ||
4 | Johnpacklambert topic banned | 9 | 0 | 0 | · | 1 second choice to Johnpacklambert banned | |
5 | Johnpacklambert banned | 3 | 5 | 0 | · | ||
6 | Lugnuts warned | 7 | 0 | 0 | · | ||
7 | Lugnuts banned | 4 | 3 | 0 | · | ||
8 | TenPoundHammer warned | 3 | 3 | 2 | · | ||
9.1 | TenPoundHammer topic banned (1) | 7 | 1 | 1 | · | ||
9.2 | TenPoundHammer topic banned (2) | 3 | 5 | 0 | · | ||
10 | TenPoundHammer banned | 2 | 5 | 1 | · | ||
11 | Request for Comment | 7 | 2 | 0 | · | ||
12 | Community encouraged | 2 | 5 | 2 | · | ||
Proposed Enforcement | |||||||
Number | Proposal Name | Support | Oppose | Abstain | Status | Support needed | Notes |
0 | Enforcement of restrictions | 0 | 0 | 0 | Cannot pass | Passes by default | |
0 | Appeals and modifications | 0 | 0 | 0 | Cannot pass | Passes by default |
- Notes