Template talk:Acid
This template is made for Wikipedia:Article Creation and Improvement Drive
Syntax
[edit]{{acid|start=start date|votes=number of votes}}
Examples
[edit]{{acid|start=October 22, 2006|votes=1}} |
|
{{acid|start=2006-10-22|votes=1}} |
|
{{acid|start=October 2, 2006|votes=1}} | |
{{acid|start=October 22, 2006|votes=2}} |
|
{{acid|start=October 22, 2006|votes=3}} |
|
{{acid|start=October 22, 2006|votes=4}} |
|
{{acid|start=October 22, 2006|votes=5}} |
|
{{acid|start=October 22, 2006|votes=6}} |
|
{{acid|start=October 22, 2006|votes=7}} |
|
{{acid|start=October 22, 2006|votes=8}} |
|
{{acid|start=October 22, 2006|votes=9}} |
|
{{acid|start=October 22, 2006|votes=99}} |
|
{{acid|start=October 22, 2006|votes=999}} |
|
I don't get it
[edit]What's the point? What's the deal with the deadlines? Why's it so complicated??? --Brandon Dilbeck 03:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- The point: to use for the WP:ACID process, the deadlines: because the process is defined using deadlines, complicated: the math system at the moment lacks integer division, so I have to round it. →AzaToth 23:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm looking at the math, one of the few times I've seen the modulus operator used... Sonic3KMaster(talk) 05:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Too many #time calls?
[edit]Currently on WP:ACID, the last several noms are broken, apparently due to too many calls being made to the #time ParserFunction. Looking at the code, it seems like the first call can simply be done away with, i.e. replace
{{#time: [[F j]], [[Y]]|{{{start|October 22, 2006}}}}}
- with
{{{start}}}
(since I'm not really sure I see the need for the default value either.) Would this be an OK change, or is there an overriding reason for the use of #time here? Respectfully yours, -- Visviva 15:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
OK, I've just gone ahead and made the above change. Feel free to revert if it isn't acceptable. By the way, I must say that is/was an impressively elegant way to enforce consistent date formatting; unfortunately in this case elegance seems to have collided with software constraints. Cheers, -- Visviva 15:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC)