Template talk:Infobox EU legislation
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 2013 July 12. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
Lay-out
[edit]{{Infobox EU legislation
European Union regulation | |
Title | Regulation laying down measures to prohibit the release for free circulation, export, re-export or entry for a suspensive procedure of counterfeit and pirated goods |
---|---|
Made by | European Council |
Made under | Art. 113 |
Journal reference | L341, 1994-12-30, pp. 8–13 |
History | |
Date made | 1994-12-22 |
Entry into force | 1995-01-02 |
Applies from | 1995-07-01 |
Preparative texts | |
Commission proposal | C238, 1993-09-02, p. 9 |
EESC opinion | C52, 1994-02-19, p. 37 |
EP opinion | C61, 1994-02-28 |
Reports | |
Other legislation | |
Replaces | Regulation (EEC) No 3842/86 |
Amends | Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 |
Amended by | — |
Replaced by | EU Customs Regulation 1383/2003 |
Repealed |
| replaces=Regulation (EEC) No 3842/86 | amends=Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 | amendedby=— | replacedby=EU Customs Regulation 1383/2003 | status=Repealed }}
European Union regulation: | |
Regulation (EC) No 3295/94
Regulation laying down measures to prohibit the release for free circulation, export, re-export or entry for a suspensive procedure of counterfeit and pirated goods | |
---|---|
Made by | European Council |
Made under | Art. 113 |
Journal reference | |
History | |
Made | 1994-12-22 |
Came into force | 1995-01-02 |
Preparative texts | |
Commission proposal | C238, 1993-09-02, p. 9 |
EESC opinion | C52, 1994-02-19, p. 37 |
EP opinion | C61, 1994-02-28 |
Reports | |
Other legislation | |
Replaces | Regulation (EEC) No 3842/86 |
Amends | Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 |
Amended by | — |
Replaced by | EU Customs Regulation 1383/2003 |
Status: Repealed |
Above: current template version, below: "large-type" version. I personally do like the large-type version, but that may be a matter of taste... Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 01:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Add links to the status of the legislation
[edit]It might not be the case that people understand what 'recast' and 'repealed' means in the case of EU legislation, should we make these status indicators links to relevant Wikipedia articles? --Martsniez (talk) 09:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Implementation date
[edit]Shouldn't it be Transposition date instead? Doblecaña (talk) 15:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Eur-Lex reference
[edit]I suggest that an Eur-lex reference is added and recommended. The link to OJ is far less useful than a link to the normal Eur-Lex page. The latter gives the user easy access both to the different national versions of the legislation, as well as links to implementing acts, judgements etc. Compare e.g. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A31994R3295 (OJ, without context) to http://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/1994/3295/oj (with context). In my experience, editors typically add OJ links without any context, when using this template. I guess it is easiest to add, rather than to replace, the Eur-LEX reference. (Another possible addition would be to the European Parliament's page for this legal instrument, but that is accessible from eur-lex, see e.g. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?lang=en&reference=1993/1024(CNS) ) Burlefot (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
There should be fields for ELI and CELEX. Kaihsu (talk) 12:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Legislative proposals
[edit]This template should be adapted and used correctly for e.g. Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act. Kaihsu (talk) 10:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)